The country marks another historical milestone with the selection of Mr R. Sampanthan, a Tamil MP by ethnicity, as the opposition leader of the Parliament. It was Mr Amirthaligam
MP who occupied the post of opposition leader of the Parliament in
1977. Scholars posit that this new turn of event symbolizes a healthy
dimension of democracy and is a sign of peace and reconciliation
restoring in the country, following the silent revolution that took
place in January 8, 2015.
Debates on the opposition leader
This selection stirred a stiff resistance among the hardcore
Sinhalese in and out of the Parliament saying that this could lead to a
division of the country and the Tamils would take an upper hand in all
the affairs. However, this superficial argument can be debunked under
several dimensions:
1) Mr Sampanthan, by being the opposition leader, cannot do anything
silly to compromise the territorial integrity and sovereignty of the
country, given that the national government(some people dub it as a
coalition government) has been formed,
2) it is naïve to argue that Sampanthan should not have been selected
as the opposition leader, thanks to his ascribed ethnicity; it is
indeed notable that this is not the first time that a Tamil MP has been
selected as the opposition leader,
3) all those who excoriate and vent their anger and frustration on
the selection of Sampanthan turned a blind eye when the powerful Eastern
LTTE Leader, Vinayagamoorthy Muralitharan, popularly known as Karuna, was made as the Vice President of SLFP, a MP and subsequently as the powerful minister in the Mahinda government, and
4) while Karuna engaged in a fierce battle, for the sole purpose of
attaining the Tamil Ealam, with the government forces before being drawn
in with Mahinda government, Sampanthan entered into the democratic
realm of the Parliament and fought for the legitimate concerns of Tamil
speaking people over the years.
All
these reasons negate the thesis advanced by certain elements with
vested interests that the selection of Sampanthan as the opposition
leader is inimical to the country. However, there is a great deal of
responsibility upon the shoulder of Mr Sampanthan, who undertakes the
task of the opposition leader in the Parliament. He should do justice to
the position he holds; he should reflect, not only the legitimate
concerns of the Tamil speaking community in the Parliament, but all the
citizens, regardless of the ethnic and religious differences, of the
country. It is intriguing that the maiden speech delivered by Mr
Sampanthan, as the opposition leader, highlighted the fact that he would
represent all the communities in the Parliament, particularly the
concerns of the Sinhala community, and thus, he registered his strong
reservation over the jumbo-cabinet numbering to almost 100 to be formed
under the national government.
As Jayadeva Uyangoda aptly noted in one of his recent articles, the
new government would undertake three gigantic, but achievable tasks: 1)
expedite the appointments of members to the constitutional councils
formulated under the 19th amendment
to the constitution, 2) engage in the process of electoral reforms, and
3) endeavor to provide regional autonomy to the minorities (Uyangoda,
2015). It is significant to note that the role of politicians
representing the minority communities- Tamils and Muslims, is paramount
in the context of the new government engaging in the tasks outlined
above.
Unity between Tamil and Muslim Politicians
As noted above, there is a greater role for the minority party
politicians to play, especially in the process of electoral reforms and
regional autonomy. It is heartening that both Muslims and Tamils have
more than 20 members in the present Parliament, with a few of them
occupying the post as cabinet, state and deputy ministers. However, such
a scenario would be changed if the electoral reforms were to be
implemented. Although the possibility of Tamil representation in the
proposed 20th amendment on electoral reforms being diluted is very
marginal, Muslims are at the receiving end. The Muslim politicians
representing various political parties should bury their differences
under the carpet in order to ensure their representation in the
Parliament is safeguarded. They, if united, can exert a great deal of
pressure, with an alliance of Tamil politicians, to the government
headed by the UNP for a fair share in the electoral reforms and ensure
that Single as well as Multi-Member Constituencies for minorities across
the country is enacted in the proposed 20th amendment. It would be a
historical blunder, if the Muslim politicians failed to forge alliance
and exerted their pressure upon the major political parties at this
juncture.
Autonomy within autonomy
The current trajectory of the national government underlines that it
could endeavor to find a long lasting solution to the protracted ethnic
issue; it would be in a process of providing regional autonomy to the
Tamil speaking people. The question, here, arises whether the Tamil
polity would recognize the Muslims as a nation or ethnic group to share
the autonomy with them. In fact, it would be inevitable for the Tamil
polity to recognize Muslim community, particularly those living in the
North and East and share the autonomy within autonomy, to bridge the gap
between the communities and for the durable relationship in the region.
The history has shown that the moderates in both camps – Tamils and
Muslims, have indicated rooms for rapprochement. They would, I am
optimistic, find ways and means to iron out their differences and go for
a solution acceptable to the both communities, if they were to be given
autonomy by the government. (Aboobacker Rameez)
*Dr. Aboobacker Rameez is a
Senior Lecturer in Sociology at South Eastern University of Sri Lanka(SEUSL),
and he could be reached at <aramees2001@gmail.com>.
Home Sri Lanka Think Tank-UK (Main Link)
No comments:
Post a Comment